Independent third-party investigations for public agencies, public-safety organizations, private employers, universities, and other institutions that need an impartial fact-finder.
Some allegations cannot credibly be investigated from the inside. The subject may be a supervisor or executive, the matter may already be public, or the organization may need greater institutional or public confidence in the outcome.
Titan steps in as a neutral outside investigator. We establish the facts through a disciplined, evidence-driven process and produce a clear, professionally documented report that can withstand review by executives, governing bodies, counsel, regulators, arbitrators, courts, or the public.
The professionals you retain are the professionals who have done the work.
Our investigators have personally conducted investigations, interviewed witnesses and subjects, weighed conflicting evidence, assessed credibility, and prepared findings.
The team includes former supervisors, internal-affairs personnel, commanders, and executives who understand the organizational consequences of an investigation.
You are told who is assigned before work begins. The experience presented to you is the experience assigned to the investigation.
We step in when an internal investigation could create an actual or perceived conflict of interest.
Reports are fact-driven, clearly reasoned, and professionally documented, with analysis kept separate from advocacy.
A managing principal oversees scope, methodology, consistency, and report quality before anything is delivered.
Each engagement is matched to an investigator with direct experience in that kind of matter.
Cities, counties, special districts, police and sheriff’s departments, corrections agencies, oversight bodies, boards and commissions
Private employers, colleges and universities, law firms, nonprofits, and security organizations
Every investigation follows the same sequence, so the client, the subject, and any later reviewer can see how the findings were reached.
We discuss the matter in general terms and confirm there is no conflict before specifics are shared.
A written scope of work and engagement terms are agreed before the investigation begins.
A lead investigator is selected for relevant experience, with a second investigator for major or document-heavy matters.
Documents, records, and video are gathered and reviewed, and witnesses and subjects are interviewed professionally.
Evidence is weighed and clear factual findings are made within the agreed scope, kept separate from advocacy.
A managing principal reviews the report for consistency and quality before it is delivered.
Our roster is built from professionals with hands-on experience in internal affairs, homicide and major crimes, use of force, personnel investigations, command review, corrections, and security.
